The story revisited from the perspective of the psychohistory
What is called "history" is at best a chronicle adjusted, to meet the needs of the political power involved in the events described, or it reflects the ideological positions of the narrators, who must in any case always deal with the power in charge. We also see this in current reports, those of newspapers, radio and TV, in which the narration of facts is always adjusted in order to satisfy a "power" or an "idea"...
According to the theory of Albert Einstein it can be deduced that a form that manifests itself in space is simple in time. In other words, the energetic projection of the form can only be identified in relation to its temporal prosecution. Hence the idea that everything and every event are simple space-time projections, and therefore "imaginary", or perceptible through consciousness, which is indeed an inseparable continuum... Only a reflected consciousness, that of the mind, is able to stop the frames in the chaotic spatial-temporal energy flow, making the forms, the facts, in short, what makes up the development of the action, not only visible but also consequential and sensorially experimentable.
In the description of events, defined history, the impression of the observer prevails (as shown above), this is the characteristic of the individual mind that, perceiving through the network of its predispositions, interprets and adjusts the meanings of the lived or reported actions.
At this point, in order to know the "truth" one must turn to the psychohistory, or rather to the ability to read the automatic memorization of the non-perceptible accounting record, present in the set of events. So if we want to know the history, the true one, it is necessary to enter the akashic warehouse of the vital mnemonic function, which is present in a holographic form in each of us.
We must fish in the unconscious, we must perceive what is present in the universal mind in the form of a psycho-physical mnemonic trace. It is necessary to understand the events narrated not only from the point of view of the narrator but of the various characters described. We must sink into the archetypal world and know how to recognize each of the evoked "models". We must let go of reason and analysis to dwell on the collective memory from which messages and insights can emerge that are different from the conclusions described in the official story.
According to the theory of the "psycho-history" one could arrive at this through the residual memorial analysis imprinted on the objects involved in the events. For example, if we wanted to establish the truth about the facts that accompanied the death of Gaddafi, even in the absence of his corpse, that obviously could be the best transmitter, we could use any object he owned and used in those fateful moments .. his golden gun? His boots? But I personally do not support this "physical" vision, preferring the "psychic" one of reworking within the mind, with specific references to the event, through a sort of meditative trance, a little what happens to mediums during seances.
With this method, results can be "disruptive" compared to those that are the opinions on the causes of historical events, for example in the analysis that establishes the reasons for the fall of the Roman empire, both the decadence of the costumes and the descent are usually highlighted of the barbarians but it never takes into account the consequences of the Christian affirmation, which was truly a disruptive and destructive fact of the Roman world, transforming it from a secular political civilization into a mere religious foundation.
And here it seems to me useful to make a little disgression. After the discovery of the Qumran scrolls it was evident that the teachings and the chronicles contained in them anticipated in fact all Christian teachings. Only that those scrolls were very much antecedent to the hypothetical birth of Christ. After the destruction of Jerusalem by Tito the Jewish diaspora intensified (which had already begun since time immemorial since the Jews were already present in many places in the world). Among the various Jewish groups or sects that of the Essenes was the most spiritually qualified and the least rooted to the rabbinical traditions.
The Essenes pursued a "humanitarian" philosophy in which they already prefigured a "universal" ideology then continued by the Christian church. Moreover the Essenes had understood one thing .. that in the Jewish scriptural imagination the arrival of a messiah, savior of Israel, continued to be envisaged. But of Messiahs or self-defined ones they had passed to tens over the centuries and the result had always been disappointing. For this reason the Essenes decided - pragmatically - that it was no longer worthwhile to project the arrival of the Messiah in the distant future (which for all the other Jews to maintain the "faith") and also realized that a religion that could be transmitted only by direct inheritance (genetically) could not triumph among human populations. They decided therefore two things that radically changed their structure, widening it more and more, and also making their "religion" more accessible to everyone. First they established that the Messiah was not to come in the future but had already come in the past and "described" (as a historical fact) a character (who from the point of view of the Roman official chronicles never existed) putting in his mouth those teachings they did part of their tradition (that of the famous Dead Sea scrolls above) and above all they established that one could adhere to their "religion" not only for wealth but also for conversion .... That was the cause of the definitive split between the Essene sect and traditional Judaism and from that fracture Christianity was born (which assumed its own specific identity starting from the III century AD or better from the year 1000 of Rome).
This example path, which I have narrated here, is the result of a psychohistoric "reading".
Paolo D’Arpini
According to the theory of Albert Einstein it can be deduced that a form that manifests itself in space is simple in time. In other words, the energetic projection of the form can only be identified in relation to its temporal prosecution. Hence the idea that everything and every event are simple space-time projections, and therefore "imaginary", or perceptible through consciousness, which is indeed an inseparable continuum... Only a reflected consciousness, that of the mind, is able to stop the frames in the chaotic spatial-temporal energy flow, making the forms, the facts, in short, what makes up the development of the action, not only visible but also consequential and sensorially experimentable.
In the description of events, defined history, the impression of the observer prevails (as shown above), this is the characteristic of the individual mind that, perceiving through the network of its predispositions, interprets and adjusts the meanings of the lived or reported actions.
At this point, in order to know the "truth" one must turn to the psychohistory, or rather to the ability to read the automatic memorization of the non-perceptible accounting record, present in the set of events. So if we want to know the history, the true one, it is necessary to enter the akashic warehouse of the vital mnemonic function, which is present in a holographic form in each of us.
We must fish in the unconscious, we must perceive what is present in the universal mind in the form of a psycho-physical mnemonic trace. It is necessary to understand the events narrated not only from the point of view of the narrator but of the various characters described. We must sink into the archetypal world and know how to recognize each of the evoked "models". We must let go of reason and analysis to dwell on the collective memory from which messages and insights can emerge that are different from the conclusions described in the official story.
According to the theory of the "psycho-history" one could arrive at this through the residual memorial analysis imprinted on the objects involved in the events. For example, if we wanted to establish the truth about the facts that accompanied the death of Gaddafi, even in the absence of his corpse, that obviously could be the best transmitter, we could use any object he owned and used in those fateful moments .. his golden gun? His boots? But I personally do not support this "physical" vision, preferring the "psychic" one of reworking within the mind, with specific references to the event, through a sort of meditative trance, a little what happens to mediums during seances.
With this method, results can be "disruptive" compared to those that are the opinions on the causes of historical events, for example in the analysis that establishes the reasons for the fall of the Roman empire, both the decadence of the costumes and the descent are usually highlighted of the barbarians but it never takes into account the consequences of the Christian affirmation, which was truly a disruptive and destructive fact of the Roman world, transforming it from a secular political civilization into a mere religious foundation.
And here it seems to me useful to make a little disgression. After the discovery of the Qumran scrolls it was evident that the teachings and the chronicles contained in them anticipated in fact all Christian teachings. Only that those scrolls were very much antecedent to the hypothetical birth of Christ. After the destruction of Jerusalem by Tito the Jewish diaspora intensified (which had already begun since time immemorial since the Jews were already present in many places in the world). Among the various Jewish groups or sects that of the Essenes was the most spiritually qualified and the least rooted to the rabbinical traditions.
The Essenes pursued a "humanitarian" philosophy in which they already prefigured a "universal" ideology then continued by the Christian church. Moreover the Essenes had understood one thing .. that in the Jewish scriptural imagination the arrival of a messiah, savior of Israel, continued to be envisaged. But of Messiahs or self-defined ones they had passed to tens over the centuries and the result had always been disappointing. For this reason the Essenes decided - pragmatically - that it was no longer worthwhile to project the arrival of the Messiah in the distant future (which for all the other Jews to maintain the "faith") and also realized that a religion that could be transmitted only by direct inheritance (genetically) could not triumph among human populations. They decided therefore two things that radically changed their structure, widening it more and more, and also making their "religion" more accessible to everyone. First they established that the Messiah was not to come in the future but had already come in the past and "described" (as a historical fact) a character (who from the point of view of the Roman official chronicles never existed) putting in his mouth those teachings they did part of their tradition (that of the famous Dead Sea scrolls above) and above all they established that one could adhere to their "religion" not only for wealth but also for conversion .... That was the cause of the definitive split between the Essene sect and traditional Judaism and from that fracture Christianity was born (which assumed its own specific identity starting from the III century AD or better from the year 1000 of Rome).
This example path, which I have narrated here, is the result of a psychohistoric "reading".
Paolo D’Arpini